1111
Свободное общение / Re: Просто так
« : 06 Октябрь 2020, 18:32:32 »
Я конечно дико извиняюсь..... Мож прибить НАХ.. эту тему? Прохождение она не улучшает..... В инете местОв "повоевать" куча.
Длинноволновики всех стран объединяйтесь!
LW-mans of all countries unite!
В этом разделе можно просмотреть все сообщения, сделанные этим пользователем.
New one for you / me Alex , kiwi web sdr not far from G3kev , east coast , using mini-whip Ae
[g8fzk, my old class B call , 1970's]
20:18 136 R7NT de G8FZKSDR Op32 1797 mi -40 dB F:2% in 1540.9 Hz with 100w + W.sLoop
20:18 136 R7NT Op32 1540.9 Hz -40 dB |--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------- --------| Fade: 2%
73-G
The first public candidate release of WSJT-X 2.3.0 is now available for
download and use by beta testers. This release is your first chance to
try two new modes designed especially for use on the LF and MF bands,
and to provide feedback to the WSJT Development Team. The new modes are:
- FST4, for 2-way QSOs. Options for sequence lengths from 15 seconds
to 30 minutes, with threshold sensitivities from -20.7 to -43.2 dB in
a 2500 Hz reference bandwidth.
- FST4W, for WSPR-like transmissions. Sequence lengths from 2 minutes
to 30 minutes, threshold sensitivities from -32.8 to -44.8 dB.
FST4-60 is about 1.7 dB more sensitive than JT9, largely because it uses
multi-symbol block detection where appropriate. With AP decoding in FST4
the advantage can be as much as 4.7 dB. Additional sensitivity details
with respect to path Doppler spread are illustrated in the following
graph comparing JT9 and FST4-60:
https://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/k1jt/jt9_vs_fst4.pdf
FST4W-120 is about 1.4 dB more sensitive than WSPR, and FST4W submodes
with longer transmissions have proportionally better sensitivity.
Decoding probabilities are plotted as a function of SNR on the additive
white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channel for WSPR and all FST4W submodes
here: https://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/k1jt/wspr_vs_fst4w.pdf
Tests over the past several months have shown FST4 and FST4W frequently
spanning intercontinental distances on the 2200 m and 630 m bands.
Further details and operating hints can be found in the "Quick-Start
Guide to FST4 and FST4W":
https://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/k1jt/FST4_Quick_Start.pdf
We strongly recommend that users of JT9 and WSPR on the LF and MF bands
should migrate to the more sensitive modes FST4 and FST4W.
Links to installation packages for Windows, Linux, and Macintosh are
available here:
http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/k1jt/wsjtx.html
Scroll down to find "Candidate release: WSJT-X 2.3.0-rc1".
You can also download the packages from our SourceForge site:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/wsjt/files/
It may take a short time for the SourceForge site to be updated.
WSJT-X is licensed under the terms of Version 3 of the GNU General
Public License (GPL). Development of this software is a cooperative
project to which many amateur radio operators have contributed. If you
use our code, please have the courtesy to let us know about it. If you
find bugs or make improvements to the code, please report them to us in
a timely fashion.
We hope you will enjoy using this beta release of WSJT-X 2.3.0. Please
report bugs by following instructions found here in the User Guide:
http://www.physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/wsjtx-doc/wsjtx-main-2.3.0-rc1.html#_bug_reports
-- 73 from Joe, K1JT, Steve, K9AN, and Bill, G4WJS
Ну и что, зайти сюда и почитать нельзя чтоль? Что, весь форум чтоль под замок спрятать теперь?Ром, ты уже сам себе проиворечишь.
И вот тут всю эту дискуссию может читать теоретически- кто угодно.
С rw3adb ПОЛНОСТЬЮ СОГЛАСЕН !!!Подтверджаю. Шаопчка из алюминиевой фольги спасет человечество!
Кстати, искал нормативные документы по санитарным нормам на эелектромагнитное излучение, нашел только от 1996 года и тот помечен как не актуальный.Алексей, все есть. актуальное.
При спуске КА учитывают наклон орбиты, если слишком крутой спуск - то снижение пойдёт по баллистической траектории, если слишком пологий - то будут отскоки от верхних слоёв атмосферы, прыжков таких может быть два и более перед тем как КА войдёт в атмосферу.Во блин. Спасибо за ликбез.
Чой-то вдруг камень будет отскакивать от атмосферы?Вот и я про то-же. От майловцев всего можно ожидать.
прежде чем «отскочить» обратно в космос.Читал. Андрей, а "остскочить" корректное слово? слух режет...
As some of you know, I have been part of the test group for the new
modes. I think they should be available very soon. Just a few final
things being worked on.
I can share a few test results comparing WSPR to FST4W.
http://n1bug.com/FST4WvsWSPR/2E0ILY.txt
http://n1bug.com/FST4WvsWSPR/K3RWR.txt
And also some internal tests with FST4W-1800.
http://n1bug.com/FST4W_Test/FST4W-1800A_WeakSigTest_Notes.txt
http://n1bug.com/FST4W_Test/FST4W-1800A_WeakSigTest_Decodes.txt
One problem regarding FST4W and WSPRnet. WSPRnet does not provide any
way to tell FST4W apart from WSPR. Also no way to know which T/R period
is being used. To make it even worse, WSPRnet "corrects" times ending in
5 to make them look like WSPR2 ! I hope some of you will join me in
using call sign suffixes to show which mode and speed you are reporting.
All of my spots are uploaded like this:
N1BUG/2 ... WSPR2
N1BUG/15 ... WSPR15
N1BUG/120 ... FST4W-120
N1BUG/300 ... FST4W-300
N1BUG/900 ... FST4W-900
N1BUG/1800 ... FST4W-1800
I use these for RX reporting only. On TX I use only my call sign N1BUG
from another WSJT-X instance. That is because the suffix will cause
problems with the message encoding.
Nightly monitoring for this winter at my station will be WSPR2, WSPR15,
FST4W-120/300/900/1800, Op32, EU and TA QRSS windows. I will also
monitor some FST4 but not sure which speeds.
I will be very interested to try some DX QSOs with FST4 !
73,
Paul N1BUG
Можно поискать список позывных и выдернуть его оттуда. И написать в рсгб чтоб все выдернули.Уже озадачились.
Вообще весь этот дип-серч каое-то шаманство реально станция не работает- и тут бац- три декода в дипе!
Yes your right Stefan .
repeating noise patterns or keying artifacts , do present ''a'' detector with a
tempting resolve , in a single pass system, using look up table , frequency is not too important ,
compared to the 'time' stamp as the output is always valid ,
Demonstrably ,.No intent to defraud , its a technical issue ,
The software is listed in psk-map Stats ' as Op32Rx v1.8.6+crrl+opds/Rptr V1.4
Its obviously shipped with a pre-loaded call list to enable deep search [ correlation]
I don't know , as to who compiles , edits or distributes the list , spots me on 136
sometimes , along with other anomalies , ie, no MF tx permits for Russia , but
RN3AGC 2E0ILY 600m OPERA 2584 km 22:39:35,
This appears to be fixed list , where as the Ros-Opera app , dynamically maintains
and purges the deep search list after 8 days
Probably a good time , before the oncoming season, to review the content !
one question, how do new stations enter the list ? is there a contact point ?
these are house keeping issues ,Ros addressed by decoding and web
support .
73-Graham
G0NBD
А то без картинок как то... эээ...И пошла вода в хату....